The Bard PowerPort, an implantable vascular access device, was designed to streamline medical treatments like medication delivery and IV nutrition. However, recent lawsuits claim the device’s faulty design has led to severe complications, leaving many patients with serious injuries. If you or a loved one has suffered due to a Bard PowerPort, you may be entitled to compensation. Here’s what you need to know about the Bard PowerPort lawsuit and how a qualified attorney can help.
What Is the Bard PowerPort?
The Bard PowerPort is a small medical device implanted under the skin to provide consistent access to the vascular system. Manufactured with a mix of polyurethane and barium sulfate, the device was intended to withstand repeated use. Unfortunately, flaws in its chemical design have made it prone to failures, leading to life-threatening complications for some patients.
Complications Linked to Bard PowerPort
Plaintiffs in the Bard PowerPort lawsuit report a range of complications stemming from the device, including:
- Fractures: The device’s catheter can break, potentially traveling through the bloodstream and causing further damage.
- Infections: Some patients developed severe infections at the implantation site, sometimes requiring emergency removal.
- Thrombosis: Blood clots, including pulmonary embolisms, have been reported.
- Erosion: In some cases, the device eroded through the skin, leading to pain and additional surgeries.
Who Qualifies for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
While different law firms have different case criteria, we are exploring cases for individuals who meet the following criteria:
- You had a Bard PowerPort surgically implanted after 2000.
- You experienced complications like fractures, infections (30+ days post-implantation), thrombosis (3+ months post-implantation), or device erosion.
- You’ve undergone removal, replacement, or attempted removal of the device.
- You do not have a history of hypercoagulable states
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Updates
As of now, lawsuits against Bard Access Systems and C.R. Bard, Inc. are ongoing. These cases allege that the companies failed to warn patients and medical providers about the risks associated with the PowerPort. Settlement amounts in similar medical device lawsuits have reached into the millions, although specific amounts for the Bard PowerPort cases are yet to be determined.
Why You Need a Bard PowerPort Attorney
Navigating a medical device lawsuit is complex. A skilled Bard PowerPort lawyer will:
- Investigate your case and gather necessary medical records.
- Prove the connection between your injuries and the defective PowerPort.
- Fight for fair compensation, covering medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
Contact a Bard PowerPort Lawyer Today
If you’ve experienced complications from a Bard PowerPort, don’t wait. A knowledgeable Bard PowerPort attorney can guide you through the legal process and ensure your rights are protected. At Onward Injury Law, we prioritize putting people first, offering compassionate and personalized representation.
Get your free consultation
It only takes a few minutes.
"*" indicates required fields
Our Office
Practice Areas
Locations
Our Results
-
$1,065,000.00
MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT
LaSalle County
-
$525,000.00
TRUCKING ACCIDENT
Macon County
-
$500,000.00
FARM INJURY
Piatt County
BARD PowerPort Lawsuit FAQs
The Bard PowerPort is an implantable vascular access device used to deliver medication, IV fluids, or nutrition directly into the bloodstream. While designed to simplify medical treatments, flaws in its design have led to serious complications for some patients.
Common complications include catheter fractures, severe infections, blood clots (such as pulmonary embolisms), and erosion of the device through the skin. These issues often require additional medical treatment or device removal.
While different law firms have different case criteria, we are exploring cases for individuals who had a Bard PowerPort implanted after 2000 and experienced complications like fractures, infections (30+ days post-implantation), thrombosis (3+ months post-implantation), or device erosion. Cases involving removal, replacement, or attempted removal may also qualify.
The lawsuits against Bard Access Systems and C.R. Bard, Inc. are ongoing, with claims alleging that the company failed to adequately warn patients and medical professionals about the risks of the device. Settlement amounts have yet to be determined.